POLECAMY
Koszyk
Transnational Judicial Dialogue on International Law in Central and Eastern Europe
Redakcja:
Wydawca:
Format:
ibuk
This book is a result of a research undertaken under the direction of Professor Anna Wyrozumska by an international team of scholars from selected Central and Eastern European {CEE) States within the framework of the EUROCORES project 10-ECRP-028 International Law through the National Prism: the lmpact of Judicial Dialogue. The authors examine the approach that Polish as well as Czech, Hungarian, Lithuanian, Russian and Ukrainian courts take towards international law in the light of respective regulations governing its position in domestic legal systems. The investigation focuses on judicial dialogue emerging in this context.
As the key concept of the book, the judicial dialogue is defined broadly, as a practice of using any kind of cross-references to reasoning and interpretation of law made by judges beyond a given legal system. The authors seek to understand whether, and, if so, under which circumstances and for which purposes the CEE courts enter into a dialogue with international or foreign domestic courts when international law comes into question. The ultimate objective of this study is to assess how judicial dialogue may contribute to the development of international law and, consequently, the strengthening of the rule of law.
The volume contributes significantly to the mainstream academic discourse on interpretation and application of international law putting in the spotlight the CEE states’ experience.
| Rok wydania | 2018 |
|---|---|
| Liczba stron | 504 |
| Kategoria | Publikacje darmowe |
| Wydawca | Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego |
| ISBN-13 | 978-83-8088-708-4 |
| Numer wydania | 1 |
| Język publikacji | angielski |
| Informacja o sprzedawcy | ePWN sp. z o.o. |
Ciekawe propozycje
Spis treści
| Introduction | 11 |
| I. The Central and Eastern European Judiciary and Transnational Judicial Dialogue on International Law (Anna Wyrozumska) | 15 |
| 1. Judicial Dialogue as a Means of Application of International Law | 15 |
| 2. Poland | 18 |
| 2.1. The Legal Setting for Judicial Dialogue | 18 |
| 2.2. Deference to International and Foreign Courts Decisions | 23 |
| 2.2.1. References Prompted by Applicants or Made Proprio Motu | 23 |
| 2.2.2. Identification of Customary International Law – Skrzypek, Natoniewski and Nigerian Embassy | 26 |
| 3. The Czech Republic | 29 |
| 3.1. The Legal Setting for Judicial Dialogue | 29 |
| 3.2. Deference to International and Foreign Courts Decisions | 34 |
| 3.2.1. General Remarks | 34 |
| 3.2.2. The Foreigner Requesting Asylum in a Transit Area Case | 36 |
| 3.2.3. A Dissenting Dialogue | 37 |
| 3.2.4. The Slovak Pensions Rights Case – Horizontal and Vertical Dialogue | 40 |
| 4. Hungary | 43 |
| 4.1. Dualistic Approach to International Law | 43 |
| 4.2. ‘International Legal Comparisons’ of Hungarian Courts | 48 |
| 4.2.1. The Abortion and the Status of a Foetus Case | 48 |
| 4.2.2. The Election Rights Case – the Limits of International Comparisons | 50 |
| 4.2.3. The Status of the Decisions of Foreign and International Courts | 51 |
| 5. Lithuania | 53 |
| 5.1. The Legal Setting for Judicial Dialogue | 53 |
| 5.2. Deference to International and Foreign Courts Decisions | 57 |
| 5.2.1. The Judges Salaries Case | 58 |
| 5.2.2. The Concept of Family in State Policy Case | 58 |
| 5.2.3. The Paksas Case – the Status of the Decisions of Foreign and International Courts and the Dissenting Dialogue | 60 |
| 6. The Russian Federation | 62 |
| 6.1. The Legal Setting for Judicial Dialogue | 62 |
| 6.2. Strong Dissenting Dialogue – the Answer to the ECtHR Markin and Anchugov Cases | 70 |
| 6.3. The Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties and Politics – the Crimea Case | 76 |
| 7. Ukraine | 79 |
| 7.1. The Legal Setting for Judicial Dialogue | 79 |
| 7.2. The Birth of Judicial Dialogue in Ukraine | 82 |
| 8. Conclusions | 88 |
| Bibliography | 90 |
| II. The Dialogue of CEE Constitutional Courts in the Era of Constitutional Pluralism (Izabela Skomerska-Muchowska) | 103 |
| 1. Introduction | 103 |
| 2. The Concept of Constitutional Pluralism | 105 |
| 2.1. From Dualism to Pluralism – a Conceptual Framework | 105 |
| 2.2. Institutional Dimension of the Constitutional Pluralism – the Role of Judicial Dialogue | 109 |
| 3. Judicial Dialogue in Practice of the CEE Constitutional Courts | 112 |
| 3.1. The Actors of Judicial Dialogue | 112 |
| 3.1.1. The Dialogue with the European Court of Human Rights | 112 |
| 3.1.2. The Dialogue with the CJEU | 121 |
| 3.1.3. The Dialogue with Other International Courts | 134 |
| 3.1.4. The Dialogue with Foreign National Courts | 139 |
| 3.2. The Main Fields of Judicial Dialogue | 142 |
| 3.2.1. The Judicial Dialogue on Human Rights Protection | 142 |
| 3.2.1.1. Searching for a Common Standard of Protection – Consistent Interpretation | 142 |
| 3.2.1.2. Shaping the Standard of Protection Through Judicial Dialogue – the Pilot Judgement Procedure and Beyond | 149 |
| 3.2.2. The Dialogue on EU Law | 158 |
| 3.3. The Limits of Judicial Dialogue – from Sovereignty to Constitutional Identity | 165 |
| 4. Concluding Remarks | 179 |
| Bibliography | 182 |
| III. Administrative Courts and Judicial Comparativism in Central and Eastern Europe (Joanna Krzemińska-Vamvaka) | 197 |
| 1. Introduction | 197 |
| 2. Cases with a Foreign Element | 198 |
| 3. The EU Administrative Law and Judicial Comparativism | 199 |
| 4. The Cooperation of Administrative Courts and Judges in the EU | 201 |
| 4.1. Sharing of Comparative Information | 204 |
| 4.2. Internet-Enabled Continuous Communication | 206 |
| 4.3. Exchange Programs for Practicing Judges | 207 |
| 4.4. The Structured Cooperation as a Backbone of Judicial Comparativism | 207 |
| 4.5. The CEE Cooperation | 209 |
| 5. The Overview of the References to Foreign Law by the Polish Administrative Courts | 211 |
| 5.1. Types of References | 214 |
| 5.2. Reasons for Resorting to Foreign Law | 214 |
| 5.3. Sources of Knowledge on Foreign Law | 216 |
| 5.4. Specificity | 216 |
| 5.5. Visibility and Intensity | 217 |
| 5.6. Contributors to the Judicial Comparativism | 218 |
| 6. Administrative Courts Commenting on their Comparative Activity | 218 |
| 7. Comparative Overview of CEE Judicial Dialogues in Administrative Law | 218 |
| 8. Conclusions | 222 |
| Bibliography | 225 |
| IV. The Dialogue between Selected CEE Courts and the ECtHR (Marcin Górski) | 233 |
| 1. Introduction | 233 |
| 2. The Normative Framework | 238 |
| 2.1. The Polish Example of the Influence of the ECtHR Case Law on the Domestic Legal System | 238 |
| 2.2. The Duty of Observance of the ECtHR Case Law | 241 |
| 2.3. Reopening of Proceedings Following an Adverse Ruling of the ECtHR | 249 |
| 3. The Forms of Judicial Dialogue of the CEE States’ Courts with the ECtHR Classified vis-à-vis the Criterion of Appropriateness | 254 |
| 3.1. The Proper Dialogue: Implementing the ECHR Standard by Domestic Courts or Consciously Questioning it after Thorough Analysis | 255 |
| 3.1.1. Poland | 255 |
| 3.1.2. Other CEE States | 259 |
| 3.2. The Fake Dialogue: Decorating the Reasoning Instead of Reading the Case Law and Cases of Abusive Interpretation | 265 |
| 3.3. The Failed (Non-attempted) Dialogue: Cases of Non-implementation of the ECHR Standard | 270 |
| 3.3.1. Poland | 270 |
| 3.3.2. Other CEE States | 276 |
| 3.4. Non-classifiable Decisions: Problems with Identification of the Convention’s Status or the Role of National Organs in the Convention System | 281 |
| 4. Concluding Remarks | 285 |
| Bibliography | 288 |
| V. The Preliminary Reference Procedure as an Instrument of Judicial Dialogue in the EU – the CEE Perspective (Anna Czaplińska) | 297 |
| 1. Introduction | 297 |
| 2. The Dialogue-generating Features of the Preliminary Reference Procedure | 300 |
| 3. The Preliminary Reference Practice of the Courts in the Selected CEE Member States and Its Impact on the Development of EU Law | 306 |
| 3.1. The Czech Republic | 306 |
| 3.2. Hungary | 311 |
| 3.3. Lithuania | 317 |
| 3.4. Poland | 322 |
| 4. Conclusion | 328 |
| Bibliography | 330 |
| VI. The Polish Ordinary Courts in Dialogue on International Law (Magdalena Matusiak-Frącczak) | 333 |
| 1. Introductory Remarks | 333 |
| 2. Examples of a Proper Dialogue | 335 |
| 2.1. Human Rights Protection | 335 |
| 2.2. Customary International Law | 340 |
| 2.3. Application of EU Law | 346 |
| 2.4. Other Areas of Judicial Dialogue | 349 |
| 3. Examples of a Decorative Dialogue | 351 |
| 4. Examples of a Failed Dialogue | 353 |
| 4.1. Human Rights | 354 |
| 4.2. International Customary Law | 354 |
| 5. Conclusions | 355 |
| Bibliography | 359 |
| VII. International Refugee Law and Judicial Dialogue from the Polish Perspective (Michał Kowalski) | 365 |
| 1. The Specificity of International Refugee Law and Judicial Dialogue | 365 |
| 2. The Europeanization of International Refugee Law and Judicial Dialogue | 369 |
| 3. International Refugee Law and Judicial Dialogue, Conversation or Interaction? | 373 |
| 4. The Judicial Dialogue on Refugee Law in the Polish Context | 375 |
| 4.1. Introductory Remarks | 375 |
| 4.2. The General Characteristics of the Polish Contribution to the Judicial Dialogue on Refugee Law | 376 |
| 4.3. Defining the Concept of a ‘Social Group’ | 382 |
| 4.4. Applying the Internal Protection (Flight) Alternative Principle (‘the IPA principle’) | 385 |
| 4.5. Granting Subsidiary Protection and the Denial of Access to Adequate Medical Treatment | 390 |
| 5. Conclusion | 393 |
| Bibliography | 395 |
| VIII. Lithuanian Courts in Dialogue on International Law (Elżbieta Kuzborska) | 399 |
| 1. Introduction | 399 |
| 2. The Legal Basis for Judicial Dialogue in the Domestic Law | 401 |
| 3. General Considerations Concerning Judicial Dialogue in Lithuania | 403 |
| 4. Domestic Measures for International Law Infringements | 408 |
| 5. The Application of EU Law | 413 |
| 6. Implementing Strasbourg’s Standards – Review of the Examples of Judicial Dialogue | 419 |
| 6.1. The Right to a Fair Trial and other Procedural Guarantees | 421 |
| 6.2. The Protection of Private and Family Life | 425 |
| 6.3. Freedom of Expression | 425 |
| 6.4. Rights of a Child | 426 |
| 6.5. The Right to Liberty and Security of a Person | 427 |
| 6.6. Freedom of Association | 428 |
| 6.7. Prohibition of Discrimination | 429 |
| 7. The Challenges for the Judicial Dialogue in Lithuania | 431 |
| 8. Conclusions | 433 |
| Bibliography | 435 |
| IX. Ukrainian Courts in Dialogue on International Law (Ivanna Kolisnyk) | 441 |
| 1. Introduction | 441 |
| 2. The Legal Basis for Application of International Law in a Domestic Legal System | 442 |
| 2.1. The Status of International Law within the Ukrainian Constitutional Framework | 442 |
| 2.2. Legislative Provisions Regarding the Implementation of International Law | |
| within the National Legal System | 446 |
| 2.2.1. The Law on International Treaties of Ukraine | 446 |
| 2.2.2. The procedural laws of Ukraine | 447 |
| 2.2.2.1. The Civil Procedural Code of Ukraine | 447 |
| 2.2.2.2. The Criminal Procedural Code of Ukraine | 449 |
| 2.2.2.3. The Commercial Procedural Code of Ukraine | 449 |
| 2.2.2.4. The Code of Administrative Proceedings of Ukraine | 450 |
| 2.2.3. The Law of Ukraine on Execution of Decisions and Application of Practice of the European Court of Human Rights | 450 |
| 3. The Practice of Application of International Law in the Ukrainian Legal Order | 452 |
| 3.1. The Application of the ECtHR Case Law in Ukraine | 452 |
| 3.2. References to the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations of 1961 and the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations of 1963 | 457 |
| 3.3. The importance of ‘Namibia exception’ in Judgments Regarding the Temporarily Occupied Territories of Ukraine (ICJ Advisory Opinion on Namibia of 21 June 1971) | 458 |
| 4. Conclusions | 462 |
| Bibliography | 463 |
| X. Problems with Application of International Law in Ukraine: Theoretical and Practical Issues (Taras Tsymbrivskyy) | 467 |
| 1. The Lack of Proper Definition of the Status of International Law in the Law of Ukraine | 467 |
| 2. The Application of International Law by the Constitutional Court | 474 |
| 3. Conclusions | 477 |
| Bibliography | 478 |
| XI. Who is to Give Effects to the ECtHR Decisions? The Vajnai Saga (Erzsébet Csatlós) | 481 |
| 1. Introduction | 481 |
| 2. The Background of the Vajnai Saga | 483 |
| 3. A Brief Introduction to the Status of International Legal Sources in the Hungarian Legal System | 486 |
| 4. The History Repeats Itself: the Administrative Authority versus Application of International Law | 489 |
| 4.1. The Facts | 489 |
| 4.2. The Police and the ECtHR judgment | 491 |
| 4.3. Doctrinal Background: the Non-harmonisation of Domestic Law with International Law as a Key Issue | 491 |
| 4.4. Which Standard to Apply in the Lack of State’s Implementation of the ECtHR Judgment? | 492 |
| 4.5. Which Organ is Obliged to Take International Obligations into Consideration? | 494 |
| 5. Problems Revealed by the Vajnai Saga | 497 |
| Bibliography | 500 |
Wypożyczaj w abonamencie!
Już od 2,66 zł za ebooka
